Advertising disclosure: we earn a commission if you buy through some links here. It never costs you more, and it never decides the winner.
AfterCompare
vs

Hostinger vs Cloudways: Cheap Wins, But You Pay Four Years Up Front

This is the comparison where we nearly got it wrong, so it is worth showing the working. Hostinger advertises $3.79/mo and renews at $16.99 — a 348% increase that looks like the classic budget-host bait. Cloudways is a flat $11/mo forever. It is tempting to conclude that the honest, grown-up choice is the flat price. We drafted exactly that verdict. Then we added up what actually leaves your bank account, and it said the opposite.

The 30-second verdict

Buy Hostinger. Four years costs $181.92 against Cloudways' $528, and even after Hostinger's 348% renewal it stays cheaper until month 106. Pick Cloudways only if you won't prepay four years for a site that might not last them.

The full reasoning is below — spec by spec, then the numbers, then the call.

What each one is

Hostinger

Hostinger Business Shared Hosting

Shared hosting (hPanel)

Best forA first site, a portfolio, or a client site that must be cheap now.

Cloudways

Cloudways (DigitalOcean Standard)

Managed cloud (on DigitalOcean, Vultr, AWS or GCP)

Best forAnyone who wants a real cloud server without becoming a sysadmin.

Side by side

SpecificationHostinger✓ WinnerCloudways
TypeShared hosting (hPanel)Managed cloud (on DigitalOcean, Vultr, AWS or GCP)
Price$3.79/mo — but only if you prepay 48 months (~$182 up front)$11/mo — 2GB RAM, 1 vCPU, 50GB SSD, 2TB bandwidth
Price after promo$16.99/mo — a 348% increaseNo promo. $11/mo is the permanent price.
Commitment4 years, paid in one lump, to get the headline rateNone. Hourly billing, cancel any time.
Storage50GB NVMe50GB SSD
Root accessNo — shared hostingNo — the managed layer sits on top
IncludedFree domain (1 year), backups, CDN, unlimited sites*Staging, free SSL, free migration, 24/7 support
BackupsIncludedAdd-on — $0.033/GB of offsite storage

What you will actually have paid

Total cash out, month by month, including the promotional term and what happens when it ends.The lines cross at month 106 — 8.8 years. Before that point, Hostinger has cost you less in total; after it, Cloudways has.

$0$400$800$1,200$1,60001y2y3y4y5y6y7y8y9y10ythey draw level · month 106Hostinger$1,405.20Cloudways$1,320
Read it as a table
AfterHostingerCloudwaysDifference
1 year$45.48$132Hostinger is $86.52 ahead
2 years$90.96$264Hostinger is $173.04 ahead
4 years$181.92$528Hostinger is $346.08 ahead
5 years$385.80$660Hostinger is $274.20 ahead
8 years$997.44$1,056Hostinger is $58.56 ahead
10 years$1,405.20$1,320Cloudways is $85.20 ahead

Six months in

What each one is actually like to live with, and the value score it earns — the same 0–10 number from the ranking, which you can recompute on how we score.

Hostinger

✓ Winner
5.7Fair

Genuinely the cheapest — and the four-year prepay is the price of that.

$3.79/mo is real, but it is the 48-month rate: roughly $182 handed over in one transaction. Renewal is $16.99/mo — a 348% jump, and the number nobody puts in the comparison table. But do the full sum before you recoil: $182 for four years is so far below everything else that even after the renewal shock, Hostinger stays cheaper in total for 106 months. The catch is the commitment, not the arithmetic.

What holds up

  • The cheapest credible hosting on this page, by a wide margin.
  • hPanel is the friendliest control panel in the budget tier.
  • 50GB NVMe, unlimited sites, free domain for the first year.

What to watch

  • The headline price requires paying four years in advance.
  • Renewal is $16.99/mo. Put the date in your calendar now.
  • 'Unlimited' is governed by a fair-usage policy. It is shared hosting.

Cloudways

7.5Very good

Cheaper than buying the same droplet direct from DigitalOcean.

The $11/mo entry server is 2GB RAM / 1 vCPU / 50GB SSD. DigitalOcean sells that exact configuration for $12/mo. You pay a dollar less and get the managed layer, staging and support on top. That inversion is the single strongest argument for the platform.

What holds up

  • No lock-in: hourly billing, cancel whenever.
  • Free migration and staging environments on every plan.
  • Server management, patching and firewalling handled for you.

What to watch

  • No root access. If you need arbitrary system packages, this is the wrong abstraction.
  • Backups are an add-on ($0.033/GB), not in the sticker price.
  • Bandwidth overage is billed on top ($0.02–$0.17/GB).

Yes, this contradicts our ranking

Hostinger wins here and still only ranks #7 of 10 on our value score.

That is not an error, it is the two questions being different ones. This page asks which is cheaper, and totals the cash: Hostinger wins, decisively. Our value score asks what the price costs you — it weights the four-year prepayment and the renewal cliff at 40% combined, and on that measure Hostinger scores 5.7 against Cloudways's 7.5.

Both are true at once. Hostinger is the cheapest way to keep a small site online, and it extracts a four-year commitment to be that. If you are certain, take the cheap one. If you are not, the certainty is what you are actually buying from Cloudways, and it is worth what it costs.

✓ The verdict

Hostinger — and it stays cheaper for nearly nine years.

Four years of Hostinger costs $181.92, paid up front. Four years of Cloudways costs $528. Hostinger finishes its promotional term $346 ahead — and that lead is so large that the renewal barely dents it. Once Hostinger jumps to $16.99, Cloudways is only clawing back $5.99 a month, so it does not draw level until month 106: eight years and ten months from now. If your question is 'what is the cheapest way to keep a small site online', the answer is Hostinger and it is not close. A monthly rate is not a cost. The 348% renewal is real, and it is still not enough to make Hostinger the expensive option in any timeframe you are realistically planning for.

Choose Cloudways instead if…

Buy Cloudways if you will not sign a four-year bet.

The $182 is not a subscription, it is a wager: four years, paid before you know whether the product suits you, before you know whether the site still exists. Cloudways costs roughly $346 more over those four years, and what that money buys is the right to walk away in any given month — plus a real cloud server with staging, free migration and 24/7 support, rather than a shared box governed by a fair-usage policy. If the site is a business, if it might outgrow shared hosting, or if you simply do not know where you will be in four years, pay the premium. That is a rational purchase, not a worse one. It is just not the cheap one, and nobody should tell you it is.

Visit Cloudways

Evidence & sources

Every number above comes from the vendor's own published pricing, with the date we checked it. If one of these has moved, the verdict is stale — and we would rather you caught us than trusted us.

  1. Hostinger Business is $3.79/mo on a 48-month term and renews at $16.99/mo.

    The 80%-off rate requires the full four-year commitment — about $181.92 up front. Renewal pricing is disclosed on the same page. 50GB NVMe, unlimited websites under a fair-usage policy.

    Hostinger web hosting pricing · checked July 14, 2026

  2. Cloudways is $11/mo, billed hourly, with no contract and no renewal increase.

    2GB RAM / 1 vCPU / 50GB SSD / 2TB bandwidth on DigitalOcean. Staging, SSL, migration and 24/7 support included. Cancel any month.

    Cloudways pricing · checked July 14, 2026

  3. The crossover is month 106. Until then, Hostinger has cost you less in total.

    Hostinger: $3.79 × 48 = $181.92, then $16.99/mo. Cloudways: $11/mo from day one. Cloudways closes the $346 gap at $5.99/mo, reaching parity after 106 months. Recompute it yourself from the two prices above — that is the point of showing them.

    Derived from both vendors' published pricing · checked July 14, 2026

← All verdicts

Advertising disclosure

AfterCompare is free to read because some of the links on it are affiliate links. If you buy through one, the company pays us a commission. You pay exactly the same price you would have paid going direct — the commission comes out of their margin, not your pocket.

It does not decide the winner, and it cannot. The ranking is a published formula over published prices. To rig it in favour of a host that pays us, we would have to change the formula itself, in public, where you could see us do it. That is the whole reason the score is arithmetic rather than opinion.

The proof is on the ranking itself: hosts that pay us nothing sit above hosts that pay us well, because that is where the numbers put them. A list built to serve commissions would not look like that.

Not every link earns us anything, and we do not mark the ones that do differently from the ones that don't — every host gets the same button, because a reader should not have to guess which recommendation was bought.

How we keep the money out of the verdict·The scoring formula in full